It’s already April, and at Experience Writing that means it’s time for NaPoWriMo (National (Global) Poetry Writing Month) and the A-Z Challenge. Continuing this year’s theme, I’m writing about the A to Z of Depth.
While searching for aspects of depth, I got really excited when I came across “Depth Grammar.” Could there be a more perfect topic for a writer exploring depth? However, it has turned out to be rather elusive and complicated. Here is what I’ve dug up from the depths.
Depth Grammar (Ludwig Wittgenstein) distinguishes the surface grammar of words—how words are used in a sentence, the sound of the word to the ear—from the atmosphere or feeling that words carry in different contexts. Resource: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (1921)
Deep Grammar (Charles F. Hockett): “It is as though the whole network of structural relationships between forms, overlapping sometimes into the non-speech context, constituted a complex intertwining of various kinds of valences, only one layer of which is immediately apparent to the analyst. This most apparent layer constitutes, we shall say, surface grammar. Beneath it lie various layers of deep grammar, which have much to do with how we speak and understand but which are still largely unexplored, in any systematic way, by grammarians.” Resource: A Course in Modern Linguistics (1958)
Deep Structure (Noam Chomsky): is a theoretical construct in linguistics that grammar has layers. The surface structure is the many sentences with similar meaning. Below the surface structure are the rules of making those sentences. And below that layer are all the things trying to be expressed in the sentence: where the idea for the sentence originated.
Resource: Syntactic Structures (1957)
I have been reading, and reading, searching out original sources, trying to get to the depths of Depth Grammar. The one thing I’ve learned is that I’m not a linguist, and reading texts on linguistics is slow-going and challenging. Though I did not get to a deep understanding of Depth Grammar to reveal to you, I did find some interesting things to share:
A slide show on Universal Grammar.
An interesting sketch of a Wittgenstein pinball machine design.
A Noam Chomsky interview at the University of Washington:
Fun synchronicity: When asked about poetry in the interview, Noam Chomsky mentions Seven Types of Ambiguity by William Empson. I found a copy and started reading, and right there in the introduction I read:
“In this way such a passage has to be treated as if it were ambiguous, even though it may be said that for a good reader it is only ambiguous (in the ordinary sense of the term) while he is going through an unnecessary critical exercise. Some critics do not like to recognise this process because they connect it with Depth Psychology, which they regard with fear.”
What a surprising round-about connection between Depth Grammar and Depth Psychology which I will be talking about later in the week.
Today’s Poem
The Call of the Wild in Spring
Your voice on the wind is irresistible
a familiar tune of home, irresistible
Sweet as birthday cake and resonant
as fuzzy bunny slippers, irresistible
A lit lantern when the lights go out
the comfort that lures to trust, irresistible
The glimmer in the storm, steering hope
out of the churning dark, irresistible
Maria, It’s not time yet. Don’t go into the light.
But its sparkling and its siren song is irresistible.
This poem was inspired by today’s prompts at NaPoWriMo and Writer’s Digest’s April Poem a Day (PAD) Challenge.
Thank you so much for coming by and reading my post. Any thoughts or questions about Depth Grammar? Come back tomorrow for more depth exploration and poetry.

Glad to find your blog. Linguists, like philosophers, start using polysyllabic words, and I wonder if they even know what they’re talking about. I think some of that is words to obfuscate (and doesn’t the word obfuscate itself obfuscate?) But there’s something here, and I think you really see it when you learn another language. E.g. I’ve been studying Spanish for 6 years and having a terrible time with the verbs, because they change for every type of person in dozens of contexts. They also put the direct object first and write their sentences almost backwards, to an English speaker. So to me grammar is also a way of organizing thinking, but it varies from culture to culture. It would be interesting if you saw your poetry translated into another language (and then perhaps translated back)…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting! I very nearly had a linguistics minor back in my college days, but I haven’t lingered much in that area of study since. @samanthabwriter from Balancing Act
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is an interesting concept. I hadn’t considered it before.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Depth grammar sounds so very interesting! I am going to give a listen to that video because… have to. And your ghazal is a siren song all its own – so very irresistible!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you.
LikeLike
I love languages and have learned and studied a few. I didn’t yet click through to explore the links, but I sense these are sources at a ‘high level’ of thinking (or should I say ‘deep’?). My own very simplistic interpretation would be that ‘deep grammar’ covers culture, context, intonation, social codes, etc. Those things that can make you feel that you master a language. But what do I know, I totally agree with you: this is complicated!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for reading. I love languages too.
LikeLike